Skip to content

Presentation by Tony Robbins - critique

Okay, this might be the bravest or dumbest thing I’ve done on this blog but I feel quite well motivated, so I’m going to do it now, before I “bottle-out” as we say in the UK.

I’ve read in many places about the TED presentations (such as Garr’s Presentatation Zen blog) and I have to confess I’ve not (yet) watched them all, but I have watched the one by Tony Robbins. For those of you who haven’t heard of him, he’s described variously as things like “the world’s leading motivational speaker”. For me to critisize him is pretty presumptive, but I’m going to risk it.

His presentation was apparently a good one at first sight, no doubt about it. Certainly the audience loved it - if you don’t get bored and stop watching, you’ll have seen the standing ovation at the end…. and yet I can’t help but feel that this ovation was in part at least, set up for him by previous speakers. Watch the other presentations and you’ll see what I mean: by comparison to thier content, TR was just a wind-up act.

His voice was high, in the chest and rough: all of those contribute to a sense of urgency and excitement in the audience, certainly, but also to a (longer term) feeling that he doesn’t actually mean what he says… which is ironic because for the second half of the presentation at least he was talking about emotions. Heaven alone knows what he was talking about for the first half of his presentation - I’ve forgotten already and I only watched it a few minutes ago! A victory of presentation style over presentation substance.

There is a sad but wonderful irony here too, that the second half of his presentation didn’t really even make sense overall - sure, each sentence and paragraph individually was sensible (even if it was nothing more than a hyped up re-packaging of Maslow’s pyramid of motivation with sexier wording) but the overall presentation structure didn’t hold water. (Watch the presentation yourself and see!) Why not?

Because he made the biggest mistake that presenters can make! He forgot to keep an eye on the time he had left for his presentation! Given that there was a great big count-down timer on the floor at the front of the stage, that takes some doing! So why did such an experienced presenter as TR make such a basic mistake - a mistake that meant his presentation lost focus, rushed, skipped things and ultimately just stopped and finished un-satisfactoraly for everyone?
Well, I’m probably biased because I’ve heard lots of bad things about TR and this is the first of his presentations I’ve ever actually witnessed for myself but it seemed to me that the clue lay in how well his presentation was being received…. very well indeed at the time.

I believe that’s because his presentation became a “self-presentation”. He, TR, became the focus, instead of his content. He’s a great presenter, no doubt about it, but that’s a basic mistake: perhaps a less powerful presenter would have retained the necessary ounce of self-doubt to be just that little bit more humble in his/her presentation.

A presentation is not about the presenter, it’s about the message. It seems to me that TR forgot the basic mantra of presentations:

A presentation is not about telling people what you know. It’s about telling them what they need to know, in the way they need to know it.

Go through the video again, and count the number of times you hear the word “I”.

Use these links to save to a bookmarking site! These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Simpy
  • YahooMyWeb

{ 5 } Comments

  1. john m howitt | September 6, 2006 at 8:30 am | Permalink

    So why is he successful?
    Does it mean you you can be a bad presenter if you have a good message?
    Does it mean you you can be a bad presenter if you have a good PR machine?
    Does it mean if you just spout meaningless rubbish that people want to hear it doesn’t matter how well or badly you present it?

    On a more parochial note i have seen Thomas Power present live and he is truly bad, do a critique of him Simon, that would be interesting, yet Thomas runs the highly successful Ecademy and makes it successful by being, like Tony Robbins a ‘personality’.

  2. Simon | September 6, 2006 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    Tongue in cheek answers are

    Dunno.
    Sometimes.
    Yes.
    Yes, sadly.

    I’ve never seen (or even met Thomas) so I can’t comment but I must admit I’ve not heard good things about his style. I’ve read the transcripts of his a couple of times though and I must admit they weren’t inspiring.

    S

  3. Eric Eraly | September 6, 2006 at 11:28 am | Permalink

    Hello,

    i do not know about which video or presentation you are talking or referring to so it’s difficult to judge what you say.

    i only can tell you the following ; Anthony Robbins is by far the best motivational speaker and coach in the world. He has coached the last three presidents of the USA, Lady DI, Nelson Mandela, Michael Gorbatjov, etc… This is not because he is just a good presenter. He knows very well what he talks about and he masters the psychology ofg human beings as no other person.

    If you want to experience his knowlegde and skills and find out how it can impact your life, you should attend his Unleash the power within seminar. There is one at the end of the month in London Excell.
    Don’t worry about your money, Anthony Robbins is so sure about the fact that you are going to like it taht he gives you an 100% Satisfaction guarantee.

    The only thing you have to do is have an open mind and go there to learn something about yourself! You’ll be surprised what you might find out about yourself and your limitations and possibilities.

    Nobody learns something from critisising other people. And by the way, if you have the impression that Anthony Robbins forgot about the time…very good, then he got you because Anthony Robbins does everything with a purpose and an outcome in mind.
    I can know…

    I wish you an outstanding day

    Eric Eraly

  4. Simon | September 6, 2006 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    Hi Eric - my bad - I should have put a link in my original post. I was referring to his presentation linked in Garr’s blog at

    http://presentationzen.blogs.com/presentationzen/2006/06/if_your_ideas_w.html

    Perhaps I’ve not been clear enough in my implications - I’m basing that on how strongly you jump to TR’s defence (as if he needs to be defended from the likes of mere me! :) ). I’m not saying he’s not one of the best at what he does - I was saying that even though he’s one of the best he still got it wrong here.

    Cheers…. Simon

  5. Exhsagfz | July 6, 2008 at 5:45 am | Permalink

    good material thanks

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.